full-disclosure - Re: Full-Disclosure Digest, Vol 11, Issue 59

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed Jan 25 23:46:48 2006
From: info at pcsage.biz (PCSC Information Services)
Subject: Re: Full-Disclosure Digest, Vol 11, Issue 59

While I hate to burst your bubble c0ntex, TPM and its implementation  
is entirely ON topic for Full Disclosure. Perhaps it's just out of  
your water.

Please see  the charter...
The list was created on 9th July 2002 by Len Rose, and is primarily  
concerned with security issues and their discussion. The list is  
administered by John Cartwright.

It's a reasonable request to have some disclosure on this issue as it  
has vulnerabilities that are no doubt undisclosed. Perhaps you might  
see this from the infosec side of cryptography and cert chains that  
it represents. Thanks in advance for
rtfm. If you wish to further discuss this, I'm available for email,  
so as to not sully this list with our disagreement, and your  
impending flames.

regards,

PCSC Information Services

regards,

On 25-Jan-06, at 5:45 PM, full-disclosure-request@...ts.grok.org.uk  
wrote:

> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 12
> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:11:35 +0000
> From: c0ntex <c0ntexb@...il.com>
> Subject: Re: [OT] Re: [Full-disclosure] can a brother get some
> 	disclosure?
> To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
> Message-ID: <df8ba96d0601251211n37a1e66dy@...l.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Well, since Scott, Kevin and Tim seem to be feeling rather lame and
> messing around with newsgroup etiquette, please note that this crap is
> all off topic here.
>
> ---
>
> regards
> c0ntex
>
>
> ------------------------------