full-disclosure - Open Letter on the Interpretation of "Vulnerability Statistics"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri Feb  3 15:05:45 2006
From: fw at deneb.enyo.de (Florian Weimer)
Subject: Open Letter on the Interpretation of
	"Vulnerability Statistics"

* Matt Zimmerman:

>> <http://cve.mitre.org/cve/cna.html#cnas> lists organizations, not
>> individuals.  The requirements are clearly geared towards
>> organizations, too.
>
> Unless things have changed since I went through the process, the authority
> involved does not extend to Debian in general but only to specific
> individuals.

Certainly, at Debian, only certain individuals issue CVEs.  I can't
tell if this is Debian's choice, or a result of MITRE's rules.