full-disclosure - Taking from 1 is copying. Taking from 2 is Plagiarism.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <200602240615.k1O6FEki005963@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Fri Feb 24 06:15:25 2006
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu)
Subject: Taking from 1 is copying. Taking from 2 is
	Plagiarism. 

On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 22:59:42 CST, "J.A. Terranson" said:
> This is just one more nail in the coffing of the Certificate Money
> Machines.  All you CISSP's just because worthless based upon your
> certifying authority.

Actually, it does nothing of the sort.

There were study guides before, and this one doesn't change matters.  Before this
book came out, the cert was basically just saying "This person managed to keep
enough security info inside his cranium to pass the exam".  And after the
book came out, the cert still means the same thing.

The bigger question is: "Does knowing enough to pass the exam correspond to
having actual security clue?" - but the existence of a new study guide doesn't
change the debate on that question.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20060224/afa54354/attachment.bin