full-disclosure - reduction of brute force log

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <44130B94.80903@rtij.nl>
Date: Sat Mar 11 17:42:48 2006
From: m at rtij.nl (Martijn Lievaart)
Subject: reduction of brute force log

Gary E. Miller wrote:

>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Yo Bob!
>
>On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, Bob Radvanovsky wrote:
>
>  
>
>>I am going to test these rules out -- this looks REALLy good!  But...I'v
>>e got just ONE question: why on Earth would you permit ICMP???
>>    
>>
>
>No ICMP means no P-MTU.  No P-MTU mean non-working tunnels.
>
>You want to shoot yourself in the foot, tben go ahead and block ICMP.
>  
>

All icmp messages related to pmtud are just that, RELATED. So they are 
allowed by a previous rule.

M4