full-disclosure - What about subscriber only?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <441A1ABB.3000908@f-box.org>
Date: Fri Mar 17 02:35:42 2006
From: dan-fd at f-box.org (Dan B UK)
Subject: What about subscriber only?

Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:

>I however admit being stumped - given how low this list has sunk of late,
>I'm at a loss to recommend a less technically inclined list that still
>deals with computers.
>  
>
I don't know how to comment on that really; not a good start to an 
email.. But there are many other lists around you know. This one has 
it's qualities and sometimes people kind of abuse it; we just have to 
accept that spoofed spam.. And be more intelligent with email, sign you 
emails with a key; maybe even encrypt them! (fsck just realised that 
doesn't quite work with a moderated list.. SPF.. Makes no difference, 
many x.y.zcom webmail accounts with SPF or any other form of domain 
verification. But it does limit the DSL "Zombie" IRC-Bot machines. 
(Unless they relay.. Odd though apart from the obvious 
Outlook/IE/??Thunderbird??/??Firefox?? Mail sending via exploit routes; 
generally the SMTP part of the bot will do direct comms with the 
destination(am I wrong on this?? how wrong??)))

>Might have to point them at a Martha Stewart or Barney mailing list, although
>those might be a step *up* in technical challenge (remember, arranging a dozen
>flowers in a vase requires counting to a dozen...)
>  
>
But is that a bakers dozen?

Cheers,
Dan.