full-disclosure - -ADVISORY- % =Thu Mar 16 13:23:37 EST 2006= % Buffer Overflow in Microsoft Access

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20060317021034.GA39306@redundancy.redundancy.org>
Date: Fri Mar 17 02:36:48 2006
From: lx at redundancy.redundancy.org (David Thiel)
Subject: -ADVISORY- % =Thu Mar 16 13:23:37 EST 2006= %
	Buffer Overflow in Microsoft Access

On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 08:49:59PM -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
> > If you have read http://unixgu.ru/?go=tor you would have known, that
> > he's running a Tor Node on this machine.
> 
> And the *visible difference* between a Tor node and an open proxy, is what,
> exactly? Other than it's harder to put a sniffer on the other side and see
> where the traffic inbound to the proxy is coming from?

Well, by default, Tor doesn't allow port 25 out of exit nodes. In
this case however, not only has the operator opened up port 25 out,
effectively making it an open relay, but he's actively sniffing and
publishing exit node traffic - apparently under the misguided belief
that it makes him appear terribly clever.