[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060317092549.GA24569@sivokote.iziade.m$>
Date: Fri Mar 17 09:25:54 2006
From: guninski at guninski.com (Georgi Guninski)
Subject: FrSIRT Puts Exploits up for Sale
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 08:44:10AM +0100, Michal Zalewski wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 rembrandt@...erlin.de wrote:
>
> > If you puplish something without a license it is OPEN DOMAIN
> > That means people can use it, modify it, sell it...
>
> That's nonsense. If I publish a book or a photo or a newspaper article
> without a lengthy license attached, you can copy it at will, too? The
> requirement of a license or a copyright notice is a long-running myth - it
> is good to have these, but they are not a legal requirement.
>
IANAL but believe that putting copyright sh*t in exploits/advisories
wouldn't hurt exploit writers (even if anonymous).
[1]
http://cve.mitre.org/compatible/product_type.html
just look how many lamers profit from copy/paste with the mouse
(hint - search for vulnerability database)
AFAIK hamericans are suing for getting fat because they eat too much, so
clear violations of international copyright law like this:
http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:r4EuqF0hL9YJ:www.frsirt.com/exploits/20041216.Guninski.php+copyright+guninski+site:www.frsirt.com&hl=bg&gl=bg&ct=clnk&cd=1
may raise some money with little to no investment in hungry lawyers.
another irony is the fact that v3nd0rs try to convince people that exploits
are illegal, but legitimate businesses *sell* exploits - [1].
--
?
EOM
junk
vvvv
Powered by blists - more mailing lists