[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9CA621425D6EAE4FBBD29326CC7D11061FE8D1@unity-svr.Unity.local>
Date: Thu Mar 23 15:47:00 2006
From: Ed at unityitservices.co.uk (Edward Pearson)
Subject: FW: Secure HTTP
I did a simelar thing and used it to get around my school's filtering
system. I'd wager he's trying to do something like this ;)
Unfortuatly, what Julian says is correct, you'll need to bounce the
connection through another server with stunnel forwarding the (now
encrypted) connections back to your gateway. Which isn't too bad, all
you need a halfway decent shell account (or just get a damn server)
that'll allow backgroup procs.
Just my 2 pence.
Ed
-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk
[mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk] On Behalf Of Brian
Eaton
Sent: 23 March 2006 15:40
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Secure HTTP
On 3/23/06, Julien GROSJEAN - Proxiad <j.grosjean@...xiad.com> wrote:
> Ok, but all his traffic on his network will be encrypted... no ?
> >
> > If the sites you are visiting don't support encryption, you are
> > still going to end up with data in clear-text on the wire.
> >
Sure. It depends on who and what he is worried about.
- Brian
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists