full-disclosure - Re: SendGate: Sendmail Multiple Vulnerabilities (Race Condition DoS, Memory Jumps, Integer Overflow)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sat Mar 25 00:47:28 2006
From: hdw at kallisti.se (Anders B Jansson)
Subject: Re: SendGate: Sendmail Multiple Vulnerabilities
	(Race Condition DoS, Memory Jumps, Integer Overflow)

Gadi Evron wrote:
> 
> So you are basically saying open source free software can't be trusted to
> hold high standards or be reliable or secure if I don't pay for it?

No, he's saying:
If you know a better way why don't you do it instead of yapping about what's wrong.

Theo does have the chat skills of a rhinoceros in heat but he does have a point.
If his project is mis-managed you're free to fork and do it better.

So if you know better then either contribute, create something better or be ignored.

It's bsd, just download the source, fix the problems and release a better version.

That way you'd contribute, instead of just yap.
-- 
// hdw