lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3a166c090603280914r46c051a1vdf2885434cb2c842@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue Mar 28 18:14:23 2006
From: n3td3v at gmail.com (n3td3v)
Subject: re: eeye temporary patch for current IE
	vulnerability

Unofficial patches overall just help malicious activity, and i'm not even
covering system crashes through bad implementation of third party patches.
Right now i've been monitoring the situation where eEye security have done
the worst thing possible by allowing script kids to download an unofficial
patch. eEye are a disgrace to the industry if they reckon their patch is
going to help the global oprand. To me big name players like SANS, CERT etc
should be publicly slamming eEye and others like it for offering a patch
which will never get past the boundires of the security community and all
its malicious users. I'm calling for the big name players to get behind me
in making the release of third party patches by people like eEye completely
unacceptable in the name of security. Its now a disgrace to me that eEye can
call themselves a security company. Well maybe a security company who offers
tools to aid malicious activity. As for their attempt to help legitimate
users patch their systems, thats a bit of a joke isn't it, since they aren't
hooked upto the millions of internet explorer users to be able to be an
effective solution for legitimate users.
http://groups.google.com/group/n3td3v/browse_thread/thread/a69861a3d768f39f/59589507866a0738#59589507866a0738


On 3/28/06, Jay Libove <libove@...ines.org> wrote:
>
>
> Has anyone applied and tested the eeye patch? Verified that it works, and
> that it does not do anything else?
>
> -Jay
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20060328/4b35c3cf/attachment.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ