full-disclosure - Industry calls on Microsoft to scrap PatchTuesday for Critical flaws

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3a166c090603281225m64e86272pb9179f1880f16c76@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue Mar 28 21:25:33 2006
From: n3td3v at gmail.com (n3td3v)
Subject: Industry calls on Microsoft to scrap
	PatchTuesday for Critical flaws

Cute, really cute, but still, we've got the same security situation, to
which you haven't so far had enough confidence to comment on.

At least i'm expressing an opinion on a security issue, where as you're just
arguing over aliases and who's got more credibility than who.

Can we get back on topic now?
http://groups.google.com/group/n3td3v/browse_thread/thread/a69861a3d768f39f/59589507866a0738?lnk=raot#59589507866a0738

On 3/28/06, krux <krux702@...il.com> wrote:
>
> sigh...
>
> cat <<END >> ~/.procmailrc
> :0 BH
> * n3td3v
> /dev/null
> END
>
>
> On 3/28/06, n3td3v < n3td3v@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > The problem here is, many of the n3td3v bashers are .... [ blah blah
> > blah ]
> >
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20060328/6ea75f6e/attachment.html