lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue Apr 11 20:35:46 2006
From: dbounds at gmail.com (Darren Bounds)
Subject: Re: Microsoft Internet Explorer
	Content-Disposition HTML File Handling Flaw

Please be advised my testing occured on Windows XP SP2 and Windows
2003 SP1, both with the latest versions of IE 6 and IE 7 Beta 2.

I'm hearing from various people that some versions of IE on Windows
2000 do not appear to be affected. There may be others as well.


On 4/10/06, Darren Bounds <dbounds@...il.com> wrote:
> Microsoft Internet Explorer Content-Disposition HTML File Handling Flaw
> April 10, 2006
>
> Content-Disposition (defined in RFC 2183) is often used by web
> application developers as a mechanism to instruct the web browser on
> how it should handle a file download. This is commonly used to help
> prevent access to the application scope when handling file attachments
> and mitigates the ability to leverage client-side attacks, such as
> XSS, through file downloads.
>
> While Internet Explorer does handle downloading most file types
> correctly with Content-Disposition, it mishandles HTML files and
> instead opens them inline, exposing the application scope. As such, it
> is strongly advisable that web-based software vendors use alternative
> methods to mitigate this class of attack.
>
> A simple PoC is available at the following URL:
> http://xs.vc/content-disposition/
> Feel free to compare the results of Firefox and IE.
>
> Vulnerable Versions:
> All versions up to and including Internet Explorer 7 Beta 2.
>
> References:
> http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2183.html
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/182315/
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/workshop/networking/moniker/overview/mime_handling.asp
>
> I felt it was necessary to make this flaw public now because while the
> weakness results from IEs flawed support of RFC 2183, the exposure is
> with the 3rd party applications which support it.
>
> Due to the simplicity of exploitation, it is not unlikely this is
> being used in the wild.
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Darren Bounds
>


--

Thank you,
Darren Bounds

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ