[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <200604112324.k3BNOmkr027724@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Wed Apr 12 00:24:58 2006
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu)
Subject: Shell accounts
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 23:48:41 BST, Ian stuart Turnbull said:
> Ha Ha. Yes, not a proper fiend hey. But I take it that I would be anonymous
> technically.
Nope.
Hint - if you send a packet *out* from the shell account, it's probably as a
result of another packet going *in* to the shell account.
Even the stupidest of cops can figure out that "wow - every time a packet
heads out from here to the Pentagon, a split second before, a similar packet
came in from some bozo on a cablemodem in Idaho. Maybe the Idaho guys need
to pay this guy a visit"....
Yes, you can obfuscate it with setting cron jobs and tunnelling data via covert
channels and other neat tricks, but the basic point remains - if you connect
*to* the shell, you're no longer anonymous, and if you don't connect to the
shell, you can't use the shell....
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20060411/85b216a6/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists