full-disclosure - Recall: Oracle read-only user can insert/update/delete data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <443E4DFA.80902@csuohio.edu>
Date: Thu Apr 13 14:12:40 2006
From: michael.holstein at csuohio.edu (Michael Holstein)
Subject: Recall: Oracle read-only user
	can	insert/update/delete data

> In my experience, it doesn't even work in an Exchange environment. The
> user gets a message that the message should be recalled, but the
> original is still there, even if it hasn't been read yet. I've heard
> people say that at one time it would auto-delete the message if it
> hadn't been read, but I've never seen that.

It does, provided you read the "recall" message first -- but since 
Outlook (by default) displays in reverse chronological order, and most 
people read email in the order received, it does little good.

Back when I was involved in Exchange administration, I can't tell you 
how many times I had to stop services and run exmerge against the store 
to clean out messages that somebody accidently sent to a distribution list.

That .. and all the people that got embarassed due to incorrect use of 
"reply-all" ;)

~Mike.