full-disclosure - Re: kiddie porn warning [was: Fwd: Re: montspace -- child porn (site still up)]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4444F6BC.7020200@blocked.org>
Date: Tue Apr 18 15:25:12 2006
From: lists at blocked.org (Eddie)
Subject: Re: kiddie porn warning [was: Fwd: Re: montspace
	-- child porn (site still up)]

Michael Holstein wrote:
>> Guys, please refrain from going to that site or downloading it. In 
>> some western countries just having CP on your PC means your life can 
>> be completely ruined without much further evidence or investigation 
>> before-hand.
> 
> wget to STDOUT would be safe in such situations, no?
> 
> You can't "see" an image rendered that way, unless you're Rain Man and 
> can mentally reassemble a JPG from text.
> 
>> Motive is irrelevant. Leave this to the proper authorities.
> 

Sorry for not including this one earlier...

See also U.S.C. CHAPTER 110 'SEXUAL EXPLOITATION AND OTHER ABUSE OF 
CHILDREN'(http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sup_01_18_10_I_20_110.html)

? 2252A lays out the crimes, punishments and defenses dealing with child 
pornography.

Again I am not a lawyer but from my reading of the statute, the first 
people who hit the aforementioned website would have an affirmative 
defense to prosecution (assuming they reported the site and destroyed 
any images); however, once the content of the site was posted to FD and 
people "knew" what the site contained, anyone who then visited the 
website may not.

As Gadi stated above, Motive is irrelevant. Outside of law enforcement, 
no one has right/need/responsibility to investigate. The statute (above) 
only requires "knowledge" of the child porn. It makes no references to 
"with good intention" only "knowingly receives or distributes..."

Report the suspected site, scrub any images/cache files and be done with 
it...

Eddie