[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060419063009.GB1984@suespammers.org>
Date: Wed Apr 19 07:30:05 2006
From: rodrigob at suespammers.org (Rodrigo Barbosa)
Subject: Google Groups e-mail disclosure in plain text
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 07:09:11AM +0100, n3td3v wrote:
> On 4/19/06, Randal T. Rioux <randy@...cyonlabs.com> wrote:
> I don't think the industry needs someone to "verify" an advisory for them.
Actually, you are wrong there.
More than one company pays mine to do just that. The volume of information
contained and the huge number of advisories can cost companies some big
bucks.
Then again, my company states pretty clear on all contracts that we
will only filter and analise the advisories, not produce original
ones.
As for Secunia, I really can't comment.
- --
Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob@...spammers.org>
"Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur"
"Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFERdjxpdyWzQ5b5ckRAtamAKCVyIhPigSd89NU8xssM3XMwMDq0wCgkpoi
BXnT+l9gB760dg6IyCGwILc=
=75Rg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Powered by blists - more mailing lists