[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1146850380.2136.75.camel@anduril.intranet.cartel-securite.net>
Date: Fri May 5 18:33:13 2006
From: blancher at cartel-securite.fr (Cedric Blancher)
Subject: Idle scan rediscovered!!!
Le vendredi 05 mai 2006 ? 18:49 +0200, Cedric Blancher a ?crit :
> As standard 2.4/2.6 kernels behaviour is to set DF flag to 1, and IPID
> to 0, it's a very bad candidate for an idle host.
Mitigating this...
1. there's Marco Ivaldi finding posted on Bugtraq
2. There seem to be something with ACK packets to exploit for
idle-scanning:
hping3 -A -r host -p 80
Gives back exploitable incremental IPID on a Linux 2.6.15 box.
Note that default ip_conntrack_tcp_loose of 3 prevents theses packets to
get flaged as INVALID by conntrack.
--
http://sid.rstack.org/
PGP KeyID: 157E98EE FingerPrint: FA62226DA9E72FA8AECAA240008B480E157E98EE
>> Hi! I'm your friendly neighbourhood signature virus.
>> Copy me to your signature file and help me spread!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists