Message-ID: <445F0CF9.70100@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon May  8 10:19:07 2006
From: chromazine at sbcglobal.net (Steve Kudlak)
Subject: Full Disclosure "Code of conduct"  AND AALL
	THAT JAZZ

Bwing a old time from the ARPANET and dare I say PDP-10 days something 
is kind of baffling to me. That is it seems that many people just won'r 
use private person to person email for much of anything. This baffles me 
to no end. I mean many a time I might just like to say something to afew 
people and not blast it to a whole list. Whether it is something like 
"Ok, the kids I teach meteorology too are taking more of my time that 
they did last months so I am going to spend less time on say computer 
security and operating sytstems issues or Candaian Politics , but I'll 
get back to it as soon as I can. I don't think I am that impressive a 
conrtributor that I should broadcast it to the whole list. But it seems 
if I send private messages around its like people ignore it. And being 
aware of spam assasin and vizazzodado's razor and a all that stuff I use 
prose that won't un afould of those things still people seem to act 
sometimes as if all private mail is spam or evgil lurking pedophiles or 
whatve and never check their priovate email. A couple of people on a 
Candian Poli fgeoup told me they just ignore theuir inbox.. Is trhis 
becoming a common practice. I know it isn;t so here, because people at 
least give me kindness of a ereply. The same witgh medical groups. But I 
do say Political Interest and Intelligence do sometimes seem inversely 
related,

Cute though. Anyone with lots of spare time even think of writing  
"TROLL-BOT" that would float around acting like a troll and seeing how 
many people would respond to it and what the reponses would be like. I 
was wondiring if someone in some place was going to write uo a "lonely 
girl bot that tried to get naive lonely guys to wire money bu Western 
Union to Nigeria. Oh well humans are a strange lot.

Have FUn,
Sends Steve

0.0.

0.


GroundZero Security wrote:

>>The trolls arent't the problem, it's the retarded morons who keep responding to and arguing with them.
>>    
>>
>
>So that means you too are a retarded moron ?
>
>
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Anders B Jansson" <hdw@...listi.se>
>To: "Full Disclosure" <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
>Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2006 3:09 PM
>Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Full Disclosure "Code of conduct"
>
>
>  
>
>>Aaron Gray wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>I am suggesting that we all cooperate and produce a "Code of Conduct" 
>>>for participating on the Full Disclosure mailing list.
>>>Suggested start :-
>>> 
>>>    1) No Swearing
>>>    2) No slagging others off
>>>    3) No selling of exploits and vulnerabilities
>>>      
>>>
>>I have a much better list.
>>1. Use what ever fucking language you want.
>>2. Shut the fuck up unless you have something to contribute with.
>>3. DON'T FEED THE TROLLS.
>>
>>If someone posts something that you think sucks, then _mail that person_, you don't have to mail the list to state this.
>>If you're right ,we already know, if you're wrong, you're just adding to the noise.
>>
>>The trolls arent't the problem, it's the retarded morons who keep responding to and arguing with them.
>>-- 
>>// hdw
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>
>>    
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
>
>  
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20060508/d10f411a/attachment.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists