full-disclosure - **LosseChange::Debunk it??**

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <acdc033d0605121222n228e8247k65829e67d965ee4c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri May 12 20:22:39 2006
From: michealespinola at gmail.com (Micheal Espinola Jr)
Subject: **LosseChange::Debunk it??**

I own a copy of <http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0312318/>.  No matter
what your position or level of interest,  I recommend you rent or buy
this before considering acknowledging that..

On 5/12/06, bills@...ineen.org <bills@...ineen.org> wrote:
> Research resources:
> ttp://whatreallyhappened.com/wrh_9-11_index.html
> http://www.st911.org/ - Scholars for 9/11 Truth
>
> http://www.911inplanesite.com/ -  DVD/Video production of some of the most damning evidence surrounding the attack on the Pentagon centers about substantial and incontrovertible video and photographic evidence which insights viewers to ask crucial and essential questions.  After all, the laws of physics cannot be suspended or can they?
>
>
>
> --- eisi@...urity-news.at wrote:
>
> From: eisi@...urity-news.at
> To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] **LosseChange::Debunk it??**
> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 21:27:39 +0200
>
> OK, the video shows a lot of nonsense "facts". I'm not  an aviation engineer,
> but technical educated. I don't think that there where real explosions when
> the towers went down, but I did not hear any verifyable clarification about
> the impact in the pentagon.
>
> This is the part, which makes me distrustful.
>
> So, if possible - does anyone have an explanation about the pentagon impact as
> shown in the video?
>
> Regards,
> Eisi
>
>
>
> On Thursday 11 May 2006 02:19, Morning Wood wrote:
> > the only "fact" worth investigating in this is the sales of stocks leading
> > up to 911.
> >   viewed from a technical standpoint on the pentagon attack and the towers
> > collapse... well this is just pure bullshit. anyone with basic physics and
> > any amount of avation experience can see the author is absolutly clueless
> > in regards to these technical points.
> >
> > my2bits,
> > MW
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
> http://www.911inplanesite.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>


-- 
ME2