full-disclosure - **LosseChange::Debunk it??**

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed May 17 01:57:43 2006
From: pauls at utdallas.edu (pauls@...allas.edu)
Subject: **LosseChange::Debunk it??**

--On May 16, 2006 11:48:01 PM +0100 Pete Simpson 
<Pete.Simpson@...arswift.com> wrote:
>
> The official account of 9/11, as affirmed repeatedly by governments and
> media, therefore contradicts Newton's Second Law of Motion by at least a
> factor of ten (out by an order of magnitude). Newton's Laws may have
> stood the test of time admirably for centuries, but as we have been told
> time and again, the world changed irreversibly on the 11th of September
> 2001 and officially, by implication, so too did the Newton's Laws of
> Motion.
>
Wow.  I guess you're more knowledgeable than some of the most eminent 
scientists in the US (physicists and structural engineers, architectural 
engineers, etc., etc.), who modeled the collapse of the towers and proved 
conclusively that it happened exactly the way witnesses saw it.

Paul Schmehl (pauls@...allas.edu)
Adjunct Information Security Officer
The University of Texas at Dallas
http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3824 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20060516/29a3d0f0/attachment.bin