[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ccee4b0a0605181609x2f861f7ek53438e4468c0f6c2@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri May 19 00:09:22 2006
From: duckhacks at gmail.com (Ducki3)
Subject: **LosseChange::Debunk it??**
Here is a good 911 conspiracy debunking site. I haven't had time to read it
all but surely enough I will over the weekend.
http://www.geocities.com/debunking911/index.htm
Ducki3
On 5/18/06, Paul Schmehl <pauls@...allas.edu> wrote:
>
> c0ntex wrote:
> > WTC 7 was demolished at 5pm or there abouts by controlled demolition.
> > The owner of the building admits that they decided to "pull it" and
> > the reason "because so many people had been killed in the other 2
> > towers". Odd reason, considering what information was stored there.
> >
> > Check it out at http://www.911revisited.com/video.html
> >
> Call me a fool, but I watched the entire video. To say that the
> "experts" in the video were playing fast and loose with the facts would
> be an understatement. It's certainly an appeal to authority but not an
> authority that's really authoritative.
>
> Call me still thoroughly unconvinced.
>
> BTW, Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone. There was no conspiracy there either.
>
> --
> Paul Schmehl (pauls@...allas.edu)
> Adjunct Information Security Officer
> The University of Texas at Dallas
> http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20060518/ffd41b7c/attachment.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists