full-disclosure - Call for moderation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <C093886B.1D147%ltr@isc.upenn.edu>
Date: Fri May 19 19:39:38 2006
From: ltr at isc.upenn.edu (David Taylor)
Subject: Call for moderation

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Moderating lists tends to slow things down but I have seen other security
related lists begin to get out of hand and moderation was enforced.  It
would be nice if people can just get along.  Or not get along but for
shorter periods of time.

There is a charter for this list at
http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html (which is in the
mailing list sig). 

A couple of sections:

<charter>
Moderation & Management

The [Full-Disclosure] list is unmoderated. Typically posting will be
restricted to members only, however the administrators may choose to accept
submissions from non-members based on individual merit and relevance.

It is expected that the list will be largely self-policing, however in
special circumstances (eg spamming, misappropriation) then offending members
may be removed from the list by the management.

Acceptable Content

Any information pertaining to vulnerabilities is acceptable, for instance
announcement and discussion thereof, exploit techniques and code, related
tools and papers, and other useful information.

Gratuitous advertisement, product placement, or self-promotion is forbidden.
Disagreements, flames, arguments, and off-topic discussion should be taken
off-list wherever possible.
</charter>

Does anyone know if they have actually removed people from the list?

On 5/19/06 2:16 PM, "Aaron Gray" <angray@...b.net> wrote:

Regarding some previous threads.

Some people just show how low they are !

This is why we need some form of "Code of Conduct" or even better change to
a moderated list.

Otherwise the whole list just gets ruined and will ndeteriate over time.

Heres a call for moderation before it gets too late.

Anything that is too off topic or inflamatory should get junked.

Aaron

?
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

==================================================
David Taylor //Sr. Information Security Specialist
University of Pennsylvania Information Security
Philadelphia PA USA
(215) 898-1236
http://www.upenn.edu/computing/security/
==================================================

Penn Information Security RSS feed
http://www.upenn.edu/computing/security/rss/rssfeed.xml
Add link to your favorite RSS reader

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
Comment: Generated by Gpg Tools - http://www.tomsci.com/gpgtools

iD8DBQFEbhANrFOwyUiOUlwRAqGLAKDfFyJRW5dp01tEfWOc1Zng3COOlQCgw4jX
K4AI4m/DyDN6miW0qE6f+bQ=
=MZB1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20060519/1fe57646/attachment.html