full-disclosure - Call for moderation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2006051918511400be50a438@mail.smumn.edu>
Date: Fri May 19 19:50:25 2006
From: SDALAN04 at smumn.edu (Dave Alanis)
Subject: Call for moderation

I second to the comment posted below. One of the reasons I joined Full-disclosure was for its raw unmoderated data. 

On the other hand, If we begin censoring off-topic messages we might as well start banning people by their IP ---> MAC Address :p. I would consider 0x80@...h.ai to be the first person off the list!

Say no to censorship!

>
>Moderating lists tends to slow things down but I have seen other security
>related lists begin to get out of hand and moderation was enforced.  It
>would be nice if people can just get along.  Or not get along but for
>shorter periods of time.
>
>There is a charter for this list at
>http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html (which is in the
>mailing list sig).
>

"Great Spirits Have Always Encountered Violent Opposition From Mediocre Minds" - Einstein

"Cuanta estupidez en tan poco cerebro!"