full-disclosure - Responsibility

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <75BAA28ABDE34841829819E08E31A995AF0542@hsdwdc04.hsdwdc.com>
Date: Thu May 25 14:24:16 2006
From: sforrest at hsdwdc.com (Scott Forrest)
Subject: Responsibility

My question would be why the previous IT staff didn't put the customer
access on a different leg than the actual business network? A simple
VLAN or something to keep the two separate so something like that
wouldn't happen.

Scott Forrest
IT Manager 
Hobbs, Straus, Dean & Walker, LLP
2120 L St. NW - Suite 700
Washington, D.C. 20037
202.822.8282 ext.326
sforrest@...wdc.com

-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk
[mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk] On Behalf Of <...>
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 4:08 AM
To: Greg; full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Responsibility

unfortunately if there is a paper signed by both parties "per
acceptance" of the hotel (it is usually part of the buying/lease
contract), and that includes also the IT stuff, there's nothing to
do....
a good lawyer could help on this, rather than security experts....
and, by the way, if something like this happens there's no easy way to
say you've done the utmost to lock down the customer...

just my .02?c (that's 20% more that in $)

----- Original Message -----
From: "Greg" <full-disclosure3@...andyman.com.au>
To: <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Sent: Monday, May 22, 2006 12:05 AM
Subject: [Full-disclosure] Responsibility

Large motel/hotel chain I recently acquired wants to sue previous
company
who did their I.T. work for them as a customer's wifi connected machine
infected their network and caused loss of booking data thus money.

My question then is - if you have done the utmost to lock down your
customer
but someone connects an infected machine and somehow it gets in, is the
customer right in suing you? Eg, like a car mechanic, you do the best
but
you cannot be 100% sure that something else that was never a problem
will
now cause a problem (such as a new exploit in our case that wasn't known
generally until 24 hours ago). Should you be sued at that point?

Wondering whether to dump the guy at this point.

Thanks.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Hobbs, Straus, Dean and Walker, LLP. Confidentiality Statement 
This message is intended only for the use of the individuals to which this e-mail is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable laws. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail from both your "mailbox" and your "trash." Thank you. 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------