full-disclosure - Re: [General-discussion] Graph analysis of stolen credit cards

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1148644506.12517.11.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri May 26 12:53:55 2006
From: james.mailing at gmail.com (James Eaton-Lee)
Subject: Re: [General-discussion] Graph analysis of
	stolen credit cards

On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 12:49 +0100, James Eaton-Lee wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 10:22 +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
> > (volume of accounts in thousands).   However that's from 7 years
> > ago :(
> > 
> > There may be more recent figures but a quick google can't find 'em.  
> 
> Wikipedia has some good ones on the 'Bank' page:

And the link, since I'm evidently twitchy about hitting 'send' today..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank#Bank_Size_Information

I'm actually interested as to the source of the original data - since
these are cards stolen "by one carding forum", how representative are
they of card theft globally..

 - James.

-- 
  James (njan) Eaton-Lee | 10807960 | http://www.jeremiad.org
  Semper Monemus Sed Non Audiunt, Ergo Lartus - (Jean-Croix)

sites: https://www.bsrf.org.uk ~ http://www.security-forums.com
   ca: https://www.cacert.org/index.php?id=3
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 1859 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20060526/02aaf1af/smime.bin