[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <200605270235.k4R2Zfqc006536@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Sat May 27 03:35:54 2006
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu)
Subject: RE: [security] A Nasty Security Bug that affect
PGP Virtual Disks & PGP SDA , PGP 8.x & 9.x and Truecrypt.
On Sat, 27 May 2006 00:32:21 BST, fractalg@...hspeedweb.net said:
> 1) Are you saying that the key used to encrypt is fixed (it's not our
> passphrase !?!?!), and your passphrase is just to access the disk, meaning,
> just to control user access to the pgp disk ???
No, what he's saying is that if you can subvert the PGP software at a point
after it has both the secret key and the passphrase and has combined them,
you can get access to the files.
But that's been a known attack vector against essentially all crypto for basically
forever. It's basically the same problem with using SSL to secure a network
connection - if the host itself has been compromised, you can see the data
before it goes into the tunnel.
It's similar to attacks on TCP sequence numbers - Bellovin et al pointed
out the danger, but it wasn't till Mitnick's attacks that it was actually
a practical attack.
All the same, even though it's been a known theoretical attack since PGP
was released, Adonis did a nice piece of work in actually showing it to
be a practical attack.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20060526/e40e0ac1/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists