full-disclosure - scanning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <448053B6.8000807@s21sec.com>
Date: Fri Jun  2 16:05:29 2006
From: maguero at s21sec.com (Marcos Agüero)
Subject: scanning

ad@...poverflow.com escribi?:
> That is why the definition of ?damage? is so important. If there is no
> impairment to the integrity and availability of the network, then there
> is no crime.
So, It's seems that portscanning is not a crime but, what if I scan a
network and sell/trade/lend the results to some guy that will cause that
impairment to the network? Is it a crime to sell such information?

Regards