full-disclosure - Tool Release

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c3431d2e0606031427m3f79ebe6qaa8180de1f2d88c4@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat Jun  3 22:27:38 2006
From: hailtheczar at gmail.com (Jason Areff)
Subject: Tool Release - Tor Blocker

Those acronoyms prove that I know more than you apparently. Way to
demonstrate your l33t hax0r skills.

Jason Areff
CISSP, A+, MCSE, Security+ == Better than Steven Rakick


----------
security through obscurity isnt security
----------


On 6/3/06, Steven Rakick <stevenrakick@...oo.com> wrote:
>
> Here's an idea. Remove those lame ass fucking acronyms
> from your signature you clueless fucking dork.
>
> Oh, and learn how to code you before you start posting
> like you're all that.
>
>
>
> From: full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk
> [mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk] On
> Behalf Of Jason Areff
> Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 10:32 AM
> To: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
> Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Tool Release - Tor
> Blocker
>
> It is really unfortunate that most people that replied
> to this feel the need to be haughty in their
> responses. I was simply trying to create a tool to
> give back to the community. Our servers were
> comprimised by a tor user and I saw the need to do my
> best to blacklist such users. If this is not your
> need, then please respond to me personally with any
> suggestions you may have, but do not start a public
> flame war like you are attempting.
>
>
> Jason Areff
> CISSP, A+, MCSE, Security+
>
>
> ----------
> security through obscurity isnt security
> ----------
>
>
> On 6/3/06, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
> <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu > wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Jun 2006 23:47:38 CDT, str0ke said:
> > Umm what about the new ip addresses that are added
> to the tor network?
> >
> >
> http://serifos.eecs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/exit.pl?sortbw=1&addr=1&textonly=1
>
> Ahh.. there we go.  Now a wget of that every once in a
> while, and a little
> bit of Perl kung-foo to build an 'addrs.h' file that
> gets #include'ed and
> then rebuild the module, and we're getting closer. ;)
>
> (And don't forget to throw out any alleged exit
> addresses in your own
> address space, and any other addresses you really
> don't want to block.
> It's embarassing when a clever hacker uses your own
> security routines to
> DoS you ;)
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20060603/ffea6c7c/attachment.html