full-disclosure - Sniffing on 1GBps

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20060618230052.1158B1D8F6D@supertolla.itapac.net>
Date: Mon Jun 19 01:54:40 2006
From: naif at s0ftpj.org (Fabio Pietrosanti - naif)
Subject: Sniffing on 1GBps

Denis Jedig wrote:
> There are some papers dealing with capturing and performance issues on
> the net, some of them published by members of the Winpcap team:
> http://www.winpcap.org/docs/iscc01-wpcap.pdf which share the basic
> idea that filtering should not be done within the application but
> either in the kernel or in the capturing device to reduce the number
> of copy operations and thus the load on the capturing system.
You probably need to use a statefull load balancer in order to split the
traffic between different probes (or different load balancers with
probes behind) and get the opportunity to do real-time analysis
(parametric interception).

-naif