| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <200606281605.k5SG5u0a013207@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Date: Wed Jun 28 17:06:14 2006 From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu) Subject: Breaking Passwords On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 03:01:24 CDT, Al Mac said: (trimming RISKS from the cc: list so Peter doesn't have to see what he already knows...) > http://www.itjungle.com/fhs/fhs062706-story07.html The comp.risks digest will almost never post a bare URL without some explanatory writing attached to it. Also, Peter Neumann is much more likely to choose an article that discusses *in depth* what went wrong at *one* instance (for instance, your attempted post yesterday about the data breach at OU) than "things suck all over" writing... Your best bet to get published in comp.risks is to summarize the OU incident in 3-4 well-written paragraphs, covering (a) what they did wrong (b) why it was wrong and (c) what the results were, adding possibly one or two of the *best* URLs containing further information. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 226 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20060628/b04589c2/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists