[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0c6901c6af8e$70449f00$0200a8c0@AMD2500>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 03:02:50 +0100
From: "Aaron Gray" <angray@...b.net>
To: <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Cc: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: To XSS or not?
>how we will measure which one is major and which not ?
>major for you is minor for me and vice versa.
Major is an XSS on a well used "major"web site, or a financial based webh
site even if it is a "minor" web site. A "minor" XSS web vulnability is one
on a little known site.
Hope you argee with this definition.
>if we agree that XSS are vulns (i personally agree) then they deserve to
>be reported. Just look at the subject of the message that report a XSS
>and choose to read it or to not read it.
Yes I do, but I think a spcialized list is in order for web vulnabilities.
>XSS are based on bad code practices .. some day the programmers will
>learn to not make such mistakes if we point them. if we ignore them ....
>well security is not based on ignorance.
Yes I need to learn about this area as I am doing a couple of PHP&MySQL
based web sites myself and would like a specialized list to ask Q's on.
Regards,
Aaron
>Aaron Gray wrote:
>> Major ones could still be reported on the other lists.
>>
>> Aaron
>>
>>> something like xsstraq powered on securityfocus should be cleaner yep :)
>>>
>>>> Maybe there should be a special XSS list that could specialize in
>>>> that area ?
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists