[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <acdc033d0608011200g67411636tcaba3b4adb54ba03@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 15:00:12 -0400
From: "Micheal Espinola Jr" <michealespinola@...il.com>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: 70 million computers are using Windows 98 right
now
On 7/27/06, wac <waldoalvarez00@...il.com> wrote:
> There was Windows NT workstation ;). With windows was the other way. From
> desktop to server. Of course you can change Linux so much that it won't be
> Linux anymore. Definitely putting an X server on top of unix won't make it
> ready for desktop, that's a fact.
Windows NT Workstation was in fact identical to Server - except with
intentional limiters placed within the registry to prevent admins from
avoiding purchasing the "full" server product. However, you could
hack it and make it a "Server".
NT Workstation was the 'easy way' to begin to turn the platform into a
viable desktop OS. They were able to establish a base and an
appreciation for the accomplishments of the NT OS - as well as a
corporate desire for a more stable business platform for employee
workstations.
I was a NT 3.x+ beta tester and dev support. Yep, I installed NT from
lots of floppies.
--
ME2
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists