full-disclosure - Re: JavaScript port scanning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6905b1570608020541v5bc857b5q6923d8dcdb932153@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 13:41:07 +0100
From: "pdp (architect)" <pdp.gnucitizen@...glemail.com>
To: TheGesus <thegesus@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk, pen-test@...urityfocus.com,
	bugtraq@...urityfocus.com, webappsec@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: JavaScript port scanning

At the top of the web page I am mentioning that the scanning process
is not accurate... that's it, finito. you might get better results by
increasing the timeout value... give it something like 10000 or even
more. Still, it might not work! Take some time and go through the tiny
js file to see how it works.

BTW, you might have better luck with IE6.

cheers

On 8/2/06, TheGesus <thegesus@...il.com> wrote:
> I tried this out on my test network (firefox, no proxy) and it
> reported closed ports as being open, even silly ports like -1 and
> 77777.
>
> Am I missing something?
>
> BTW, I could not find an M to RTFM.
>
> On 8/1/06, pdp (architect) <pdp.gnucitizen@...glemail.com> wrote:
> > Inspired by SPI Dynamics - tiny JavaScript port scanner
> > http://www.gnucitizen.org/projects/javascript-port-scanner/
> >
> > --
> > pdp (architect)
> > http://www.gnucitizen.org
> >
>

-- 
pdp (architect)
http://www.gnucitizen.org

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/