lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <5907BC7B-B9EE-42F2-853C-95E4901D668D@mac.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 11:34:54 -0500
From: Matt Burnett <marukka@....com>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: FD Charter

The charter says the list is supposed to be "self-policing". How do  
we take action against offending members, short of a d0s? The charter  
also says that management can remove members for "spamming" or  
"misappropriation". Have anyone from management read any of n3td3v's  
posts? Am i the only on who considers n3td3v's posts to libel?  
Couldnt his/her advertising his/her own list be considered spam. I  
really want to know how a group can be self-policing if they have no  
ability to take action?

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ