full-disclosure - Re: FD Charter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 14:44:04 -0400
From: "Dude VanWinkle" <dudevanwinkle@...il.com>
To: "Matt Burnett" <marukka@....com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: FD Charter

On 8/2/06, Matt Burnett <marukka@....com> wrote:
> The charter says the list is supposed to be "self-policing". How do
> we take action against offending members, short of a d0s? The charter
> also says that management can remove members for "spamming" or
> "misappropriation". Have anyone from management read any of n3td3v's
> posts? Am i the only on who considers n3td3v's posts to libel?
> Couldnt his/her advertising his/her own list be considered spam. I
> really want to know how a group can be self-policing if they have no
> ability to take action?

John already kicked that guy off. Didnt seem to work very well.

I removed all emails with the word "n3td3v" in the headers, subject,
or body, and that seemed to kill all the threads relating to, started
by, or people complaining about the guy. I disabled them after a while
because I like a good laugh every now and then.

On busy weeks I re-enable the filter.

-JP

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/