full-disclosure - RE: Concurrency-related vulnerabilities in browsers -expect problems

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0273B67044957C41BD71D12EBA2E00AE01AE58@becca.LarrySeltzer.local>
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 07:35:23 -0400
From: Larry Seltzer <Larry@...ryseltzer.com>
To: Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf@...ne.ids.pl>, bugtraq@...urityfocus.com, 
	full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Cc: vulnwatch@...nwatch.org
Subject: RE: Concurrency-related vulnerabilities in browsers -expect problems

"... Larry Seltzer reports from the scene."

Film@11

Larry Seltzer
eWEEK.com Security Center Editor
http://security.eweek.com/
http://blog.eweek.com/blogs/larry%5Fseltzer/
Contributing Editor, PC Magazine
larryseltzer@...fdavis.com 

-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk
[mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk] On Behalf Of Michal
Zalewski
Sent: Saturday, August 12, 2006 12:15 PM
To: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com; full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Cc: vulnwatch@...nwatch.org
Subject: [Full-disclosure] Concurrency-related vulnerabilities in
browsers -expect problems

Good morning,

  "Fame-hungry sociopath torches cars, finds browser flaws

  WARSAW, Poland (AP) -- police are on a look out for a local adolescent
  vandal who continues to terrorize local IT workers in what appears to
be
  a bizzare bid for fame. Larry Seltzer reports from the scene."

Well, I just had to do this, forgive me.

There seems to be an interesting class of concurrency-related bugs in
popular browsers. This is quite similar to signal-handling flaws you
might
be familiar with: many browser events can be triggered asynchronously,
for
example using Javascript timers, while some components of the browser
are
still running. In many cases, a new action might be initiated that
interferes with or counters the interrupted (or still executing) task.

Problems like this may leave the program in inconsistent state, and
later
cause double frees or related issues. That usually opens the door to
system compromise through careful manipulation of memory contents. The
attacks would depend heavily on network latency and jitter, but can be
executed.

Given that the tip of that iceberg has been probed recently - for
example
here: http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/2006/mfsa2006-46.html - I
assumed it is now the time to post my older example.

A fairly reliable example is when Firefox is interrupted by a Javascript
handler while parsing a deeply nested XML document for display. If the
browser is then redirected from the script to a new location, the
unfinished parsing process is aborted, and all its structures are freed
-
but these were not left in the expected state by the parser.

This is a demo that will usually crash Firefox in a couple of seconds
(SEGV on Linux and MacOS, silent crashes on Windows):

  http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/ffoxdie.html

Have fun!

PS. For the easily amused: MSIE loves "<DT><H1
STYLE=width:1px><LI></H1>"

/mz
http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/