full-disclosure - Re: LOL HY

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <44E5EB0C.2040204@brvenik.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 12:30:04 -0400
From: Jason <security@...enik.com>
To: Eliah Kagan <degeneracypressure@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: LOL HY

Apologies for adding to the noise yet again.

Eliah Kagan wrote:
> Jason appears to be calling for a dual-tracking system, whereby people
> who post lots of content that others don't like (or that just Jason
> doesn't like) use two email addresses--one for the content that people
> will wait to block, and one for the content that people will want to
> see.
> 
> I fail to see how this differs appreciably from simply telling people
> to shut up, though I appreciate that it may have been a joke (and I
> hope it was).
>

To clarify. It was fully tongue in cheek. A poke at the fact that it has
yet to be shown there was in fact no security related content in the
pictures and that it is unlikely anyone here will do so.

I would be really interested and surprised if anyone did actually do the
analysis.

Perhaps this would be a good challenge for next years Defcon. Messages
seeming to be spam sent over the span of a year containing the
information needed to get into a penthouse party...

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/