full-disclosure - Re: Microsoft product vs Microsoft patch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <44952da30608251000r317939c3n462ec7ab8159705f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 22:30:50 +0530
From: "Mike M" <mkmaxx@...il.com>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Microsoft product vs Microsoft patch

I missed you n3tty :)

>
> From: n3td3v <xploitable@...il.com>
>
> My request to security researchers:
>
> I have for a long time now been under the theory that *some* Microsoft
> patches once added together outweigh the actual file size of the
> original Microsoft product.
> <yahoo gmail m$ blah blah>
>
>
> Contact me (on or off list) to help us get this research compiled and
> pushed
> out.


Why? what do you have in mind ;)

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/