[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CC787A38400B8C7471C2CA3F@paul-schmehls-powerbook59.local>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 20:04:32 -0500
From: pauls@...allas.edu
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Re: Re: George Bush appoints a 9
year old to be the chairperson of the Information Security Deportment
--On August 29, 2006 6:56:02 PM -0400 Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 17:20:35 CDT, Paul Schmehl said:
>
>> Hezbollah tells a story. BBC repeats it. No effort is made to see if
>> the story is actually true. But it's not bias. Sure thing.
>
> That's called sloppy journalism, when you don't bother checking. Bias is
> when you *do* make an effort to check out the story, and then decide
> which version to run with. There's a difference.
>
Now why do you suppose a reporter wouldn't bother to check? And why do
you suppose his editors wouldn't check to see if he checked? Are they
*all* sloppy?
> For *that* matter Paul, *you* are showing bias (by your own definition),
> since you didn't bother actually finding out if it was a sloppy reporter
> or an actual attempt to slant the facts..
>
Well, when a news outfit is consistently "sloppy" and almost always in the
same direction (anti-Israel and pro-Hezbollah, for example), then I judge
them to be biased.
You're welcome to believe that they're not, if you so desire.
Paul Schmehl (pauls@...allas.edu)
Adjunct Information Security Officer
The University of Texas at Dallas
http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/
Content of type "application/pkcs7-signature" skipped
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists