lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AA8E89377DCB1C498CF19E343CA49D8E072501@NYEXCHSVR01.texpac.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 17:14:39 -0400
From: "Fetch, Brandon" <BFetch@...pac.com>
Cc: <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: RE: Secure OWA

Hijack:

So AOL doesn't play nice with IETF protocol standards?

*mock alarm*

NEVER!?

Sounds like a throwback to their old days of being the Internet's nanny
for the world.

"Let's 'cleanse' this data for you so as not to be offended based upon
your parental filters..."

I suppose we should be happy they're continuing their ways...

Brandon

-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk
[mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk] On Behalf Of Brian
Eaton
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 4:15 PM
To: Mark Senior
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Secure OWA

On 8/30/06, Mark Senior <senatorfrog@...il.com> wrote:
> I think a possibly better approach, although it doesn't seem like you
> could implement it quite as simply as account lockouts, would be to
> lock out, not the account, but the originating IP address, for a
> duration.

Ever since I read this thread
(http://vegan.net/lb/archive/08-2004/0118.html) on one of the
load-balancer discussion lists I've been skeptical of using IP
addresses for much of anything.  My guess is that if you do things
like ban IPs automatically you run the risk of accidentally locking
out thousands of legit users as well as the one who is misbehaving.

A few of the more interesting comments in the thread:

"...myriad of enterprise networks that load-balance outbound client
connections across proxy servers which are connected to different
ISPs, with totally different source IP..."

"...The AOL client does a split tunnel type thing, where the HTTP gets
tunneled through the UDP conversation to AOL's network and back out
the proxies to the Internet, but the HTTPS (and other stuff) goes
directly from client to server..."

Regards,
Brian

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


This message is intended only for the person(s) to which it is addressed 
and may contain privileged, confidential and/or insider information. 
If you have received this communication in error, please notify us 
immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. 
Any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action concerning
the contents of this message and any attachment(s) by anyone other 
than the named recipient(s) is strictly prohibited.


_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ