full-disclosure - Re: Linux kernel source archive vulnerable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a8139f990609081010r2dec457ap3b223756f25e3a50@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 18:10:02 +0100
From: FRLinux <frlinux@...il.com>
To: "Hadmut Danisch" <hadmut@...isch.de>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Linux kernel source archive vulnerable

On 9/8/06, Hadmut Danisch <hadmut@...isch.de> wrote:
> Ironically, if Microsoft distributed such files everyone would shout
> "hidden backdoor!"

That's a fact, but don't forget that the upstream kernel is not being
shipped as part of an update to a commercial product. Besides,
permissions are not hidden backdoor. A backdoor by definition is a
mean to access a program, here we are talking sources.

And i'll second the man who said that you should not compile a kernel
on a live system, it should be as stripped as possible.

On this happy note, it's week end time :)
Steph

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/