full-disclosure - Re: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <df8ba96d0609111220mab58200mb230ee12343fde5a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 20:20:51 +0100
From: c0ntex <c0ntexb@...il.com>
To: Philosophil <flosofl@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt
	for this

You are entitled to your opinion.

On 11/09/06, Philosophil <flosofl@...il.com> wrote:
> A link to your own blog is not support for your argument.  That's
> called circular reasoning.
>
> In addition, if you had bothered to do a little research, you would
> have noticed *huge* discrepancies.
>
> Try here:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesse_Macbeth
>
>
> The unit he claimed he was in, was not deployed where he said it was.
>
> His flash (patches, unit designations) on his uniform are either put
> on incorrectly, not used by the division he claims to be in, and/or no
> longer used by the military.
>
> His uniform is wildly... well, inconsistent is the best word here.
>
> Some of the awards and citations he claims to have received would be
> impossible to earn in the time he was active.
>
> Really, I am constantly amazed by the lack of critical thinking people
> exhibit these days.  It doesn't take long to find actual citations to
> back up a position.  A loon talking in a video is *not* a credible
> source.  Unfortunately, people want to believe something that backs
> their own opinions so much that they will take unsubstantiated stories
> as truth and use that as evidence.  Of course when someone points out
> that "evidence" is fraud and fake...  Well, at best the person gets
> ignored, at worst a tool of the vast neo-con conspiracy.  (Seriously,
> given the governments track record at keeping things secret... a
> "vast" conspiracy is ridiculous at best)
>
> Hoax and fraud does nothing but weaken one's position regardless of
> that position's overall merits.
>
>
>
>
> On 9/11/06, c0ntex <c0ntexb@...il.com> wrote:
> > http://noderat.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!6ADE4614B66EADD2!1321.entry
> >
> >
> > On 11/09/06, Philosophil <flosofl@...il.com> wrote:
> > > Uh.  You do realize this was a hoax, right?
> > >
> > > On 9/9/06, c0ntex <c0ntexb@...il.com> wrote:
> > > > http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-5587990522549547050
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > regards
> > > > c0ntex
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > > > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > > > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > regards
> > c0ntex
> >
>


-- 

regards
c0ntex

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/