full-disclosure - Re: Firefox Vulnerabilities FAKED

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 19:03:45 -0400
From: "Dude VanWinkle" <dudevanwinkle@...il.com>
To: c0redump@...ers.org.uk
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Firefox Vulnerabilities FAKED

if s00per.pink.h@xor is actually Mischa Spiegelmock i'll eat my two
week old tighty whities on youtoube.com

and about the claim that it is a fake:

The JavaScript issue appears to be a real vulnerability, Window Snyder,
Mozilla's security chief, said after watching a video of the
presentation Saturday night. "What they are describing might be a
variation on an old attack," she said. "We're going to do some
investigating."

i trust a girl named window more than a guy named pink

-JP

On 10/3/06, c0redump@...ers.org.uk <c0redump@...ers.org.uk> wrote:
> Media whores.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Pink Hat
> To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
> Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 9:12 PM
> Subject: [Full-disclosure] Firefox Vulnerabilities FAKED
>
>
> Nice to see that a group of idiots can turn a conference into a joke
> just as easily as they can a mailing list.  Was there any technical
> verification from the Toorcon guys before they accepted these asshats
> talk?
>
>
> http://developer.mozilla.org/devnews/index.php/2006/10/02/update-possible-vulnerability-reported-at-toorcon
>
>
> The main purpose of our talk was to be humorous.
>
>
>
> As part of our talk we mentioned that there was a previously known
> Firefox vulnerability that could result in a stack overflow ending up
> in remote code execution. However, the code we presented did not in
> fact do this, and I personally have not gotten it to result in code
> execution, nor do I know of anyone who has.
>
>
>
> I have not succeeded in making this code do anything more than cause a
> crash and eat up system resources, and I certainly haven't used it to
> take over anyone else's computer and execute arbitrary code.
>
>
>
> I do not have 30 undisclosed Firefox vulnerabilities, nor did I ever
> make this claim. I have no undisclosed Firefox vulnerabilities. The
> person who was speaking with me made this claim, and I honestly have
> no idea if he has them or not.
>
> I apologize to everyone involved, and I hope I have made everything as
> clear as possible.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Mischa Spiegelmock
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/