full-disclosure - Re: Removing the NIC cable = EoP?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a28ffe560610041339i664edf45pf7f63991a4efff06@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 13:39:25 -0700
From: "Pink Hat" <pinkhat.h4x0r@...il.com>
To: "Lee Turner" <lvturner@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Removing the NIC cable = EoP?

With 98 boxes you are correct this can happen.  But, anyone who
remembers doing policies on 9x boxes will also remember that you can
tell it to not allow login if the profile is not available.  9x is not
an OS that can be relatively secured.

On 10/4/06, Lee Turner <lvturner@...il.com> wrote:
> Given the .co.uk domain name and the fact that it is a highschool computer,
> my thoughts are that this infers an RM (research machines) network.
>
> I have heard of this method working on RM networks in the past involving
> windows 98 machines, although I cannot verify that it works (the or now).
>
> <evrything else snipped>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter:
> http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/