[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0610080314380.22104-100000@linuxbox.org>
Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 03:21:39 -0500 (CDT)
From: Gadi Evron <ge@...uxbox.org>
To: bugtraq@...uxbox.org
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Insecurity Stats via Google Code Search
This isn't terribly shocking, and seems rather preliminary. Still,
very interesting.
Jose Nazario worked out some numbers using the Google code search.
http://monkey.org/~jose/blog/viewpage.php?page=google_code_search_stats
Interesting quotes:
some stats based on simple queries used to find bugs (ie based on some
reasonable regular expressions):
* strcpy from argv[x]: about 7,000
* strcat from argv[x]: about 1,000
* PHP-based remote file include vulns: 117 or so using GET, 100 or so
for POST
* PHP-based SQL injection vulns:
o SELECT: about 600 using GET, about 500 using POST vars
o UPDATE: about 200 using GET, about 400 using POST vars
o DELETE: about 300 using GET, about 300 using POST vars
* PHP-based XSS vulns (it is the summer of file include, SQL injection
and XSS on bugtraq): about 2700
o about 200 based on the info sent outside of the POST vars or
the URL requested (ie User-Agent fun)
o an additional 100 based on COOKIE variables ...
* *printf-based buffer overflows? about 202,000 possible, hopefully
lss!
* about 50 format string vulns revealed
* off-by-ones (as pointed out by aaron@)? about 300.
* CreateFileMapping NULL Security (using Ollie's idea but adjusted for
google codesearch): about 400
I also keep updating every search pattern I find, here:
http://blogs.securiteam.com/index.php/archives/663
Gadi.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists