full-disclosure - Re: Is Firefox JavaScript flawed ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0610102003150.30255@datavibe.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 20:05:16 +0000 (UTC)
From: darkcube <darkcube@...avibe.net>
cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Is Firefox JavaScript flawed ?

On Tue, 10 Oct 2006, Brad Causey wrote:

> At this point the accusations made at toorcon have no validity to them. They

says you.

i'm staring at an IDA window that says otherwise.

> Firefox. However, I think this a good shock to the community. Just because
> something is open source and holds the number two slot for the browser
> marketshare, doesn't make it bulletproff. People have a bad habbit of
> assuming that because it's not Microsoft that it is super secure.

that's such an awesome opinion to be so profoundly formulated and cast 
about like any real infosec warrior would!

(btw, fix your fucking spellcheck.)

  - 'cube [DTM/uH/wouldntyouliketoknow?]

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/