[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 20:28:14 -0700
From: Andrew Farmer <andfarm@...il.com>
To: zeroknock@...aeye.org
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Googling:Google Meta Bugs
On 10 Oct 06, at 19:53, Aditya Sood wrote:
> Andrew Farmer wrote:
>> On 10 Oct 06, at 18:29, Aditya Sood wrote:
>>> This post deals with the googling effects that google provide
>>> with its
>>> search engine.Since in searching algorithms the metacharacters are
>>> handled with proper filtering techniques which we have not seen
>>> it in
>>> google.Already explanation given to google but i think they are
>>> getting
>>> googled not to handled these unexceptional searches.What we call
>>> it...
>>
>> I tried several of the searches listed, and observed no unusual
>> behavior
>> in the search results. A number of the searches yielded very few
>> results
>> due to misspelled keywords (like "filtetype"). Have you really
>> tried any
>> of these searches, or are you just generating queries at random?
>
> A] Do check you are making search with advanced "IM Feeling Lucky
> Button"
> B] Its all working previously and have been reported to google.May be
> they have set changes but do try
> it will provide results which is not at all possible for search
> engines.
I tried several of the suggested queries again, both with and without
"I'm Feeling Lucky". None of them produced any anomalous behavior. What
are we supposed to be looking for, exactly?
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists