full-disclosure - Re: Googling:Google Meta Bugs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <452D08A3.7080107@metaeye.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 20:37:15 +0530
From: Aditya Sood <zeroknock@...aeye.org>
To: zeroknock@...aeye.org
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk, "Dave \"No,
	not that one\" Korn" <davek_throwaway@...mail.com>
Subject: Re: Googling:Google Meta Bugs

Aditya Sood wrote:
> Dave "No, not that one" Korn wrote:
>   
>> Aditya Sood wrote:
>>
>>   
>>     
>>> This post deals with the googling effects that google provide with its
>>> search engine.
>>>     
>>>       
>>   You just invented a new phrase that does not exist in any dictionary. 
>> What are "googling effects"?  And how did you expect everyone else in the 
>> world to know a private phrase you just made up in your own head?
>>
>>   
>>     
>>> Since in searching algorithms the metacharacters are
>>> handled with proper filtering techniques which we have not seen it in
>>> google.Already explanation given to google but i think they are
>>> getting googled not to handled these unexceptional searches.What we
>>> call it.
>>>     
>>>       
>>   That was just plain gibberish.
>>
>>   
>>     
>>> Explanation:
>>>     
>>>       
>>   No, those aren't explanations, they are *examples*.  You completely forgot 
>> to say anything at all about what is supposed to happen.
>>
>>   
>>     
>>> Well Only GOOGLE can give the answer.
>>>     
>>>       
>>   No, only YOU can tell us what on earth you're talking about.
>>
>>     cheers,
>>       DaveK
>>   
>>     
> Hey what ever you suppose to.
>
> Well if google has accepted it so better you should too.
>
> Check Down : Response from google"
> Well i dont want to say anything more about nerd talk.
> Better to accept new stuff ok not stoic
>
> "
> T---------------------------- 

> Original Message ----------------------------

> Subject: Re: [#55295087] Flaw In Google Search Engine

> From: security-external@...gle.comDate: Fri, April 28, 2006 11:38 amTo: "Aditya Sood" <Aditya@...aeye.Org

> --------------------------------------------------------------------------

> Thank you for your note. Please rest assured that Google never inserts jokes or sends messages by changing theorder of its results. Occasionally, when a particular website is the subject of public attention, other sites beginlinking to it. This may elevate its importance as gauged by our ranking software, which assigns a PageRankvalue based in part on who links to a given page. Higher ranking in Google results may lead to moreawareness, which may lead to more links and so on.One side effect of not using an editorial viewpoint to determine the ranking of results is that anomaliesoccasionally occur. We view such occasions as opportunities for us to learn more about how the web worksand how to improve our algorithms for all searches in the future.Regards,The Google Team
>   
>   

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/