lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <242a0a8f0610121140q7610ad5bqdae5613a2360ff21@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 14:40:54 -0400
From: "Brian Eaton" <eaton.lists@...il.com>
To: full-disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: distributed cracking countermeasures

I have a vague memory of somebody designing a cryptographic system or
puzzle that was supposed to be resistant to distributed cracking.  The
system was supposed to be intrinsically non-parallelizable.  You could
throw a bigger CPU at the problem, but more CPUs wouldn't help.

Does this ring any bells?

Regards,
Brian

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ