full-disclosure - Re: [vendor-sec] Fwd: probably integer overflow in konqueror 3.5-latest and earlier

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a28ffe560610131620w57cd201ai4f146ab6ce3130f0@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:20:00 -0700
From: "Pink Hat" <pinkhat.h4x0r@...il.com>
To: "Georgi Guninski" <guninski@...inski.com>
Cc: security@....org, full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk, vendor-sec@....de,
	Josh Bressers <bressers@...hat.com>, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
Subject: Re: [vendor-sec] Fwd: probably integer overflow
	in konqueror 3.5-latest and earlier

On 10/13/06, Georgi Guninski <guninski@...inski.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 01:11:24PM -0400, Josh Bressers wrote:
> >
> > Use CVE-<F*CK> for this issue.
> >
>
> the redhat persons means for THIS:
> (the png is well formed, but the redhat person wasn't elligible to know it.)
>
>
> -------------------
> <html><head>
> <!--
> Copyright Georgi Guninski
> may not be used in vulnerability databases - like mitre/symantec

So are you ever going to work up the balls to actually test of your
silly little copyright is enforceable?

This is the equivalent of the idiotic email disclaimers people use.
In fact, I am going to take every piece of code you have published in
a public forum and republish it somewhere else and make a profit from
it.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/